ROLFE v. CLARK

[No. 271, September Term, 1972.]

269 Md. 14 (1973)

304 A.2d 231

ROLFE ET AL. v. CLARK ET AL., PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF BERTHA G. ROLFE

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 14, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James C. Chapin, with whom were Nylen & Gilmore on the brief, for appellants.

Rex L. Sturm, with whom were Brown & Sturm on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before MURPHY, C.J., and McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.


SMITH, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

We shall here be concerned with the notice provisions in Code (1957, 1969 Repl. Vol., 1972 Cum. Supp.) Art. 93, §§ 7-501 and 7-502, the failure of a personal representative to give the notice required by § 7-502 when applying for commissions and whether under the circumstances of this case exceptions to the ratification of the administration account filed some days after that account was ratified by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases