PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff appeals from a final judgment rendered after a jury verdict was reported for the defendant. The point involved urges that the court committed reversible error when it allowed a state statute as to the speed limit on state highways to be read into evidence. Appellant contends that the evidence in the record is only susceptible to the interpretation that the area in question was not subject to the general statute. The record demonstrates that...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
