1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 268 Md.
  5. 268 Md. 12 (1973)
 

ROBINSON v. BRODSKY

[No. 114, September Term, 1972.]

268 Md. 12 (1973)

298 A.2d 884

ROBINSON ET AL. v. BRODSKY ET AL.

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided January 18, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew E. Greenwald, with whom were Karl G. Feissner, William L. Kaplan, Thomas P. Smith, Fred R. Joseph, Walter E. Laake, Jr., and Feissner, Kaplan, Smith & Joseph on the brief, for appellants.

Brainard H. Warner, III, with whom were Kaslow & Warner on the brief, for appellees.

The cause was argued before BARNES, McWILLIAMS, SINGLEY, SMITH and DIGGES, JJ.

McWILLIAMS, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

One might say with reasonable accuracy that Penn Gardens Section Two v. Melnick, 256 Md. 72, 259 A.2d 520 (1969), was a harbinger of this case. If Penn Gardens presented, as it did, a tangled skein, then this dispute falls just short of being a veritable Gordian knot. The chancellor, Moore, J., like Alexander, cut through it all with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases