GARSON v. HOHENLEITNER


73 Misc.2d 192 (1973)

Max Garsen, Respondent, v. Helmut G. Hohenleitner et al., Appellants.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

February 1, 1973


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael C. Gray and Henry J. Boitel for appellants. Garfield, Gelman & Garfield (Milton Gelman of counsel), for respondent.

Concur — LUPIANO, J. P., QUINN and MARKOWITZ, JJ.


Per Curiam.

Landlord's notice to tenants dated December 11, 1971, purportedly given pursuant to subdivision f of section 52 of the New York City Rent, Eviction and Rehabilitation Regulations, directing them to "remove from the apartment you occupy" was not a sufficient notice terminating the tenancy (Rasch, New York Landlord and Tenant [2d ed.], § 1023; cf. Real Property Law, § 232-a). It was not definite...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases