1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.3d
  4. 9 Cal.3d
  5. 9 Cal.3d 16 (1973)
 

HIMMEL v. STATE BAR

Docket No. L.A. 29953.

9 Cal.3d 16 (1973)

506 P.2d 1014

106 Cal. Rptr. 638

HARVEY B. HIMMEL, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

March 12, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Harvey B. Himmel, in pro. per., and Gerald G. Wolfson for Petitioner.

F. LaMar Forshee, Herbert M. Rosenthal and Ronald W. Stovitz for Respondent.

OPINION

THE COURT.

This is a proceeding under Business and Professions Code section 6083, subdivision (a) and rule 59(a) of the California Rules of Court to review a recommendation of the State Bar Disciplinary Board that petitioner, Harvey B. Himmel, be placed on probation for three years on the condition, among others, that he be suspended from the practice of law for nine months.

Himmel was admitted to practice in this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases