STATE v. MIMS

No. 623-3.

9 Wn. App. 213 (1973)

511 P.2d 1383

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. CASWELL MIMS, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

June 26, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David K. Crossland and Ivy, Elofson, Vincent & Hurst, for appellant.

Lincoln E. Shropshire, Prosecuting Attorney, and Robert N. Hackett, Jr., Deputy, for respondent.


MUNSON, J.

Defendant was charged with armed robbery and appeals from a judgment upon the jury's verdict of guilty as charged.

The defendant sets forth three assignments of error, none of which requires a recitation of the facts relied upon to support the robbery charge. He asserts: (a) the trial court erred in failing to poll each juror, individually, regarding a newspaper story appearing in the morning newspaper the second day of trial; (b) it was necessary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases