1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 34 Ohio
  5. 34 Ohio St. 2d 176 (1973)
 

ROTHFUSS v. HAMILTON MASONIC TEMPLE CO.

No. 72-539.

34 Ohio St. 2d 176 (1973)

ROTHFUSS ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. HAMILTON MASONIC TEMPLE CO. OF HAMILTON, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 30, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Irving I. Saul, Miss Mary C. Lord and Mr. T. Patrick Lordeon, for appellants.

Messrs. Baden, Jones & Scheper, for appellee.

CORRIGAN, J.

Appellants' six propositions of law can be condensed into two legal questions for this court to consider.

Appellants' first contention is that the trial court did not err in its charge to the jury that the appellee maintained a qualified nuisance and was negligent as a matter of law.

This court has recognized that the duty owed by possessors of land to those who may be injured on their premises...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases