MAUMARY v. MAYFAIR MARKETS


512 P.2d 1370 (1973)

In the matter of the Compensation of George E. MAUMARY, Claimant. George E. Maumary, Appellant, v. MAYFAIR MARKETS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided August 6, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas E. Wurtz, Springfield, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs were Moore, Wurtz & Logan, Springfield.

Roger R. Warren, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and THORNTON, JJ.


THORNTON, Judge.

Claimant raises two issues in this workmen's compensation case. He first contends that he has shown himself to be within the "odd-lot" category and entitled to an award for permanent total disability. Before the circuit court, claimant sought to introduce additional evidence into the record, and the circuit court refused either to hear the evidence itself, or to remand the case to the hearing officer. On...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases