APPLICATION OF MULLIN

Patent Appeal No. 8905.

481 F.2d 1333 (1973)

Application of George Cruise MULLIN et al.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

August 16, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. Hogan, Cincinnati, Ohio, Abraham Ogman, Peabody, Mass., attorneys of record, for appellants. Morris Fidelman, Fidelman, Wolffe, Leitner & Hiney, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D. C., for the Commissioner of Patents. John W. Dewhirst, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and ALMOND, Senior Judge.


ALMOND, Senior Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals sustaining the examiner's rejection of claims 1-5 and 12 of appellants' application1 for "Abrasive Article And Method For Its Production." Claims 1-5 were rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102. Claim 12 was rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm the rejection of claims 1-4 and reverse as to claims 5 and 12.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases