ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. v. FEDERAL POWER COM'N

No. 72-1636.

483 F.2d 1275 (1973)

ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION, Respondent, The People of the State of California et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit,

Decided July 30, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Miller, Jr., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

William M. Sawyer, Atty., F. P. C. with whom Leo E. Forquer, Gen. Counsel, George W. McHenry, Jr. Acting Sol., F. P. C., were on the brief, for respondent.

Lawrence Q. Garcia, with whom J. Calvin Simpson, San Francisco, Cal., was on the brief, for intervenors People of the State of California and the Public Utilities Commission of the State of California. Sheldon Rosenthal, San Francisco, Cal., also entered an appearance for intervenors State of California and the Public Utilities Commission for the State of California.

Frederick T. Searls, Malcolm H. Furbush and Daniel E. Gibson, San Francisco, Cal. were on the brief for intervenor Pacific Gas and Electric Co.

C. Hayden Ames and Donald J. Richardson, Jr., San Francisco, Cal., were on the brief for intervenor San Diego Gas and Electric Co.

Thomas F. Brosnan, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for intervenor Tucson Gas and Electric Co.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and TAMM and ROBB, Circuit Judges.


TAMM, Circuit Judge:

We are asked to review the Federal Power Commission's [Commission] denial of an application for a certificate of public convenience and necessity filed by El Paso Natural Gas Company [El Paso]. For reasons set forth below, we remand for further consideration of environmental issues.

I

For present purposes, the facts may be summarized briefly. El Paso is a natural gas company within the scope of the Natural Gas Act.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases