PER CURIAM:
Appellant was tried and convicted by a jury of armed robbery (22 D.C.Code §§ 2901 and 3202), assault with intent to commit robbery while armed (22 D.C. Code §§ 501 and 3202), and assault with a dangerous weapon (22 D.C.Code § 502). Appellant contends that his conviction on all charges must be reversed because it was based upon identifications which were allegedly obtained by unconstitutional means.
I. The Validity of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.