UNITED STATES v. CASANOVA

No. 72-2626.

472 F.2d 1223 (1973)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee. v. Jack Henry CASANOVA, also known as Jack Casini, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 2, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

L. M. Giovanini (argued), Beaverton, Ore., for defendant-appellant.

Michael L. Morehouse, Asst. U. S. Atty. (argued), Sidney I. Lezak, U. S. Atty., Portland, Ore., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before TRASK, GOODWIN, and WALLACE, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM:

A bonding company appeals a district court judgment of forfeiture after the person bonded failed to appear for trial. Notice to the bonding company was adequate under Fed.R.Crim.P. 46(f) (3). The judgment was valid.

After the forfeiture, the fugitive was recaptured in a distant state, and the bonding company sought to have the matter reopened. The fugitive was not returned to the District of Oregon. The government had been put to considerable expense...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases