IN RE MULTIDISTRICT VEHICLE AIR POLLUTION

M.D.L. Docket No. 31.

367 F.Supp. 1298 (1973)

In re MULTIDISTRICT VEHICLE AIR POLLUTION.

United States District Court, C. D. California.

November 21, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Office of the Attorney General, State of Ohio, Columbus, Ohio, Alan Witten, William J. Scott, Atty. Gen., State of Ill., Antitrust Div., Chicago, Ill., Robert F. Coleman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jerome H. Torshen, Chicago, Ill., Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., Anti-Monopolies Bureau, New York City, John M. Desiderio, Asst. Atty. Gen., Schwartz & Alshuler, Los Angeles, Cal., Marshall Crossman, C. Jon Handy, Santa Monica, Cal., William R. Bernstein, Los Angeles, Cal., Perry Goldberg, Chicago, Ill., Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Coleman, Philadelphia, Pa., Edward F. Mannino, Philadelphia, Pa., Richard H. Borow, Irell & Manella, Los Angeles, Cal., Robert W. Warren, Atty. Gen., Harold J. Lessner, Asst. Atty. Gen., Madison, Wis., William J. A. Sturtz, Long Beach, Cal., Norman Redlich, Corp. Counsel, New York City, David I. Shapiro, Washington, D. C., Sidney P. Howell, Jr., Rogers, Hoge & Hills, New York City, David Berger, Philadelphia, Pa., H. Laddie Montague, Jr., William H. Kuretsky, Deputy Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Minn., Fredric C. Tausend, David G. Knibb, Seattle, Wash., William L. Dwyer, John S. Ebel, Culp, Dwyer, Guterson & Grader, Seattle, Wash., Paul C. Duncan, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chief, Civ. Div., State of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Okl., The Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, San Juan, Puerto Rico, Francisco de Jesus Schuck, Atty. Gen., Vern Miller, Atty. Gen., Topeka, Kan., William H. Ward, Asst. Atty. Gen., Glenn Warner, Karpf, Leibow & Warner, Beverly Hills, Cal., Gerry J. Elman, Deputy Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Harrisburg, Pa., Carl W. Divelbiss, Divelbiss & Gage, Phoenix, Ariz., Anthony C. Joseph, Asst. Atty. Gen., Los Angeles, Cal., and Cooper & Scarpulla, Josef D. Cooper, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

O'Melveny & Myers, Warren M. Christopher, Allyn O. Kreps, George A. Manfredi, Los Angeles, Cal., Cross, Wrock, Miller & Vieson, J. Herbst, Detroit, Mich., Forrest A. Hainline, Jr., Gen. Counsel and Vice President American Motors Corp., Detroit, Mich., Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Julian O. von Kalinowski, Marsha K. McLean, Charles C. Ivie, Frederick R. Wirtz, Los Angeles, Cal., Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering, Lloyd N. Cutler, Louis F. Oberdorfer, Robert P. Stranahan, Jr., James S. Campbell, Washington, D. C., Pacht, Ross, Warne, Bernhard & Sears, Harvey M. Grossman, Los Angeles, Cal., McCutchen, Black, Verleger & Shea, Philip K. Verleger, Max K. Jamison, Jack D. Fudge, David A. Destino, Los Angeles, Cal., Paul A. Heinen, Chrysler Corp., Detroit, Mich., Ziegler, Dykhouse, Wise & Huth, William E. Huth, Detroit, Mich., Overton, Lyman & Prince, Carl J. Schuck, George Christensen, Frederick A. Clark, Los Angeles, Cal., Roger W. Barrett, Robert L. Stern, Erwin C. Heininger, Robert F. Finke, Mayer, Brown & Platt, Chicago, Ill., Wright Tisdale, James M. MacNee, III, Ford Motor Co., Dearborn, Mich., Lawler, Felix & Hall, Marcus Mattson, R. F. Outcault, Jr., William E. Prachar, F. John Nyhan, Los Angeles, Cal., Kirkland & Ellis, Hammond E. Chaffetz, George D. Newton, Jr., John H. Morrison, Chicago, Ill., Ross L. Malone, Robert A. Nitschke. Burton L. Ansell, General Motors Corp., Detroit, Mich., Latham & Watkins, Alan N. Halkett, David V. Lee, Los Angeles, Cal., Donald S. Bowie, Mack Trucks, Inc., Allentown, Pa., Munger, Tolles, Hills & Rickershauser, Carla A. Hills, Los Angeles, Cal., Covington & Burling, John H. Schafer, III, E. Edward Bruce, Washington, D. C., and George V. Brown, Edward F. Green, White Motor Corp., Cleveland, Ohio, for defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

REAL, District Judge.

This matter is now before the Court upon remand from the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in In Re Multidistrict Vehicle Air Pollution M.D.L. No. 31, 481 F.2d 122 (1973), (hereafter MDL 31). Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court undertakes to fulfill the admonition of the appellate court after its rejection of plaintiffs' damage...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases