IN RE BRADY


64 N.J. 100 (1973)

312 A.2d 505

IN THE MATTER OF LAWRENCE P. BRADY, JR., AN ATTORNEY-AT-LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 12, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Paul M. Hanlon argued the cause for the Hudson County Ethics Committee.

Mr. Gerald D. Miller argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Miller, Hochman, Meyerson and Miller, attorneys).


PER CURIAM.

The Hudson County Ethics Committee found respondent Lawrence P. Brady, Jr. guilty of having violated two disciplinary rules of the Code of Professional Responsibility, namely, DR9-101(C) by indicating or implying to his client that he was able to influence improperly a public official, and DR9-102(B) (4) by failing to pay or deliver to his client funds she had entrusted to him.

The Committee conducted a two-day hearing on charges made by Mrs. Carol...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases