1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 504 P.2d
  5. 504 P.2d 1074 (1973)
 

OTT v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND

504 P.2d 1074 (1973)

In the matter of the Compensation of Joel Dan OTT, Claimant. Joel Dan Ott, Respondent, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 5, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and John W. Osburn, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Richard Kropp, Albany, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were J. David Kryger and Emmons, Kyle, Kropp & Kryger, Albany.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and FORT and THORNTON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this workmen's compensation appeal the hearing officer and the Board found that the claimant's disability was not work related and therefore not compensable. The trial court on review de novo found that it was compensable and made an unscheduled disability award of 64 degrees. The extent of the disability and the amount of the award, assuming compensability, are not challenged.

The hearing officer, Board and trial judge all wrote opinions reviewing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases