BUCKNER TRUCKING, INC. v. UNITED STATES

Civ. A. No. 71-H-531.

354 F.Supp. 1210 (1973)

BUCKNER TRUCKING, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Defendants, and United States Steel Corporation et al., Intervening Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. Texas, Houston Division.

February 23, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marvin Schulman, Prappas, Caldwell & Moncure, Houston, Tex., for plaintiff.

Anthony J. P. Farris, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Walter B. Comegys, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., John H. D. Wigger, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., for defendant United States of America.

Fritz R. Kahn, Gen. Counsel, Charles H. White, Jr., Atty., I.C.C., Washington, D. C., for defendant Interstate Commerce Comm.

Wayne L. Emery, Pittsburgh, Pa., Richard P. Keeton, Vinson, Elkins, Searls & Smith, Houston, Tex., for intervening defendant United States Steel Corp.

Austin L. Hatchell, Lanham, Hatchell & Sedberry, Austin, Tex., for intervening defendants Roy L. Jones, Inc. and Western Lines, Inc.

James W. Hightower, Hightower & Alexander, Dallas, Tex., for intervening defendants J. H. Rose Truck Lines, Inc., F. B. Walker, Inc., Wales Transp., Inc., Parkhill Truck Co. and H. J. Jeffries Truck Line, Inc.

Joe G. Fender, Fender & Crawford, Houston, Tex., for intervening defendants Hill & Hill Truck Line, Inc. and E. Jack Walton Trucking Co.

Phillip Robinson, Mert Starnes, Paul D. Angenend, Robinson, Felts, Starnes & Nations, Austin, Tex., for intervening defendants H. S. Anderson Trucking Co. and Tom Hicks Transfer Co.

Thomas E. James, Morgan Nesbitt, Dallas, Tex., for intervening defendant C & H Transportation Co.

Before INGRAHAM, Circuit Judge, NOEL and BUE, District Judges.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

CARL O. BUE, Jr., District Judge:

In this action plaintiff Buckner Trucking, Inc. seeks to set aside and enjoin enforcement of certain orders of defendant Interstate Commerce Commission (Commission) which resulted in the grant of certificates of public convenience and necessity to twelve intervening defendants. Jurisdiction is invoked under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1336, 2321-2325 and 5 U.S.C. §§ 702-706. A three-judge court was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases