CRAWFORD v. MERRILL LYNCH


41 A.D.2d 112 (1973)

James Crawford, Appellant, v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

February 28, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bond, Schoeneck & King (Robert E. Moses of counsel), for appellant.

Hancock, Estabrook, Ryan, Shove & Hust (Robert A. Small of counsel), for respondents.

Order entered March 12, 1971 — GOLDMAN, P. J., and DEL VECCHIO, J., concur with CARDAMONE, J.; SIMONS, J., dissents and votes to dismiss appeal as moot in opinion, in which WITMER, J., concurs.


CARDAMONE, J.

The appellant, James Crawford, was employed for two years as a securities salesman by respondent Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. (Merrill Lynch) in an office managed by respondent Pierson. He claims respondent owes him $8,850 for commissions he earned working for them and commenced an action seeking recovery. Respondent moved to dismiss the complaint and to compel arbitration under...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases