FRIENDS OF THE EARTH v. UNITED STATES ATOM. ENERGY COM'N

No. 73-1866.

485 F.2d 1031 (1973)

FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION and the United States of America, Respondents, Northern States Power Company et al., Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

August 24, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Z. Roisman, Washington, D. C., was on the motion for emergency consideration and summary reversal.

Jerome Nelson, Sol., Leon Silverstrom, Atty., Wallace H. Johnson, Asst. Atty. Gen., A. E. C., and Raymond N. Zagone, Atty., Dept. of Justice, were on the opposition for respondent.

George H. Lewald, Boston, Mass., Harold Reis, Washington, D. C., and Dale G. Stoodley, Boston, Mass., for intervenor Boston Edison Co.

George F. Trowbridge, Washington, D. C., was on the motion for intervenor Jersey Central Power and Light Co. and Northern States Power Co.

Arvin E. Upton, Eugene B. Thomas, Jr., and James P. McGranery, Jr., Washington, D. C., were on the motion for intervenor Niagra Mohawk Power Corp.

Ezekiel G. Stoddard, Washington, D. C., was on the motion for intervenor, General Electric Co.

Jerome Ackerman, Washington, D. C., and William H. Cuddy, Hartford, Conn., were on the motion for intervenor Connecticut Light and Power Co., etc.

Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of petitioner's motion for summary reversal, and of the oppositions submitted thereto, it is

Ordered by the Court that the aforesaid motion for summary reversal is denied.

Separate statements by Chief Judge BAZELON and Circuit Judge LEVENTHAL.

BAZELON, Chief Judge:

Petitioner seeks summary reversal of an order of the Atomic Energy Commission which found no warrant for an emergency cutting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases