1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.2d
  4. 59 Wis.2d
  5. 59 Wis.2d 87 (1973)
 

BAILEY v. STURM

No. 86.

59 Wis.2d 87 (1973)

207 N.W.2d 653

BAILEY and husband, Appellants, v. STURM, Defendant: PITTS, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided June 5, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Campbell, Brennan, Steil & Ryan, S. C., attorneys, and James E. Brennan of counsel, all of Janesville, and oral argument by James E. Brennan.

For the respondent there was a brief by Stafford, Rosenbaum, Rieser & Hansen of Madison, and oral argument by Willard S. Stafford.

ROBERT W. HANSEN, J.

As the trial court stated, the issues raised are whether the care and treatment of Dr. Pitts was negligent and whether the care and treatment given was the cause of plaintiff's loss of vision in one eye. The trial court left the jury's finding of negligence stand, and Dr. Pitts claims the trial court should have changed the jury answer on his negligence from "Yes" to "No." The trial court did change the jury's answer as to causation from "Yes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases