CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU v. CHUN

No. 5218.

506 P.2d 770 (1973)

CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU, a municipal corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Frederic Kwai Tin CHUN, Ruby Wong Chun, Defendants-Appellants, and Aetna Life Insurance Company and Finance Factors, Limited, Defendants.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

Rehearing Denied April 30, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur S.K. Fong, Honolulu, for defendants-appellants.

Wesley Fong, Deputy Corp. Counsel, City & County of Honolulu (Paul Devens, Corp. Counsel, and Winston H. Jensen, Deputy Corp. Counsel, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee.

Before RICHARDSON, C.J., and MARUMOTO, ABE, LEVINSON and KOBAYASHI, JJ.


ABE, Justice.

The appellants, hereinafter referred to as the "Chuns," are owners of property located at the corner of Prospect and Emerson Streets in the City and County of Honolulu. The property runs along the hillside of Punchbowl and slopes toward Prospect Street. Prior to April 30, 1969, the Chuns had received approval of their plan for the construction of an apartment on the subject property.

On April 30, 1969...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases