GLAZIER v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND


516 P.2d 757 (1973)

In the matter of the Compensation of Clinton E. GLAZIER, Claimant. Clinton E. Glazier, Appellant, v. STATE ACCIDENT INSURANCE FUND, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 10, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert H. Grant, Medford, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Grant & Ferguson, Medford.

Al J. Laue, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Lee Johnson, Atty. Gen., and W. Michael Gillette, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LANGTRY and FORT, JJ.


SCHWAB, Chief Judge.

The principal issue in this workmen's compensation case as presented by the litigants is whether the claimant's conversion hysteria is permanent and, if so, the extent of his disability. The secondary issue is whether claimant suffered a permanent partial disability to his right leg.

The claimant has a background of numerous injuries and complaints (some rather bizarre) during his working life. Some 18 years before, he had suffered from...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases