PER CURIAM.
In this action between a paving contractor and a real estate developer the contractor recovered a verdict and judgment in the full amount of its claim for work done by it under a written agreement with the developer. The developer's claim that the work was defective was rejected by the jury.
We find no error except in allowing the contractor to recover the amount of sales tax paid by it for the material used in performing its paving contract. The...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.