1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 485 F.2d
  5. 485 F.2d 780 (1973)
 

ENVIRONMENTAL DEF. F., INC. v. ENVIRONMENTAL PRO. AGCY.

Nos. 72-1548, 72-1690, 72-2183 and 73-1015.

485 F.2d 780 (1973)

ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, Respondent, Coahoma Chemical Co., Inc., Intervenor. ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND, INC., Petitioners, v. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, and William D. Ruckelshaus, Administrator, Respondent. COAHOMA CHEMICAL CO. et al., Petitioners, v. William D. RUCKELSHAUS, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent, EDF et al., Intervenors. OLIN CORPORATION, Petitioner, v. William D. RUCKELSHAUS, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent. CAROLINA CHEMICALS, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. William D. RUCKELSHAUS, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided March 30, 1973.

Supplement June 6, 1973.

Judgment Affirmed June 11, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen F. Eilperin, Washington, D. C., with whom Walter H. Fleischer, was on the motion for respondents.

William A. Butler and John F. Dienelt, Washington, D. C., for petitioners Environmental Defense Fund and others.

Robert L. Ackerly and Charles A. O'Connor, III, Washington, D. C., for petitioners Coahoma Chemical Co. and others.

Before WRIGHT, LEVENTHAL and ROBB, Circuit Judges.

Judgment Affirmed June 11, 1973. See 93 S.Ct. 2770.

PER CURIAM:

This cause came before this court on consideration of Respondent Ruckelshaus' motion for immediate issuance of a temporary restraining order and for an injunction against further proceedings in a suit pending in another court.

On June 14, 1972, Respondent Ruckelshaus as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), issued an order relating to the suspension of the use of DDT on...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases