1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 475 F.2d
  5. 475 F.2d 766 (1973)
 

RENKEN v. HARVEY ALUMINUM (INCORPORATED)

No. 72-2564.

475 F.2d 766 (1973)

R. L. RENKEN et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. HARVEY ALUMINUM (INCORPORATED), Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 27, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arden E. Shenker (argued), Lamar Tooze, Jr., Robert M. Kerr, Portland, Ore., for defendant-appellant.

Douglas M. Ragen (argued), Frederic A. Yerke, of Miller, Anderson, Nash, Yerke & Wiener, Portland, Ore., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before BARNES, MERRILL, and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the defendant from an Order of the United States District Court for the District of Oregon, confirming the arbitrator's award for the plaintiffs, after the entry of a consent decree. Error is charged against the District Court's Order confirming the award, made on June 14, 1972, in two respects: (a) respondent's alleged error in failure to give adequate notice; and (b) an alleged fraud in presentation of an earlier claim by a respondent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases