1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 357 F.Supp.
  5. 357 F.Supp. 853 (1973)
 

UNITED STATES v. DANIEL, URBAHN, SEELYE AND FULLER

No. 72 C 312.

357 F.Supp. 853 (1973)

UNITED STATES of America For the Use of R. Rudnick and Company, an Illinois corporation, v. DANIEL, URBAHN, SEELYE AND FULLER, a partnership, et al.,

United States District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

April 12, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John M. Burke, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

James R. Thompson, U. S. Atty., by R. B. Schaeffer, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

AUSTIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a corporation engaged in the general construction business, brought this suit under the Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 270a et seq. There are four defendants, one a partnership, Daniel, Urbahn, Seelye and Fuller (hereinafter referred to as "DUSAF"), alleged to be composed of the other defendants, which are another partnership and two corporations. The complaint has previously been dismissed as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases