1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 496 S.W.2d
  5. 496 S.W.2d 708 (1973)
 

SUNSHINE v. MID-SOUTH CONSTRUCTION, INC.

No. 18103.

496 S.W.2d 708 (1973)

Howard A. SUNSHINE, Appellant, v. MID-SOUTH CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al., Appellees.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

Rehearing Denied July 12, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen E. Hulme, Woodruff & Smith, Dallas, for appellant.

H. Norman Kinzy, Strasburger, Price, Kelton, Martin & Unis, Dallas, for appellees.

BATEMAN, Justice.

The principal question here is whether the transactions involved were of such a nature as to require the plaintiff to be either a duly licensed real estate broker or salesman or attorney-at-law, within the purview of Article 6573a,1 in order to maintain this suit. The appellant Howard A. Sunshine sued for a commission of $32,705 plus attorneys' fees and interest; the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases