1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 496 S.W.2d
  5. 496 S.W.2d 673 (1973)
 

ROGERS v. BURTON

No. 12001.

496 S.W.2d 673 (1973)

Dr. N. Jay ROGERS, Appellant, v. Dr. Jack BURTON et al., Appellees.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Austin.

Rehearing Denied July 11, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Q. Keith, Mehaffy, Weber, Keith & Gonsoulin, C. M. Bradford, Beaumont, McGinnis, Lochridge & Kilgore, Austin, for appellant.

Crawford C. Martin, Atty. Gen. of Texas, Austin C. Bray, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Austin, for appellees.

O'QUINN, Justice.

This is a lawsuit brought by Dr. N. Jay Rogers, an optometrist practicing in Beaumont, against the members of the Texas Optometry Board, with its principal office in Austin.

By his suit plaintiff sought a declaratory judgment construing a specified portion of Article 4552-5.11, Vernon's Anno.Civ.Statutes, a part of the Texas Optometry Act, which became effective September 1, 1969. (Acts 1969, 61st...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases