LICHTENSTEIN v. LICHTENSTEIN

No. 72-1924.

481 F.2d 682 (1973)

Frances Sharp LICHTENSTEIN v. Maurice LICHTENSTEIN, Appellant, and Darby Farms, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided June 29, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay D. Barsky, Silver & Barsky, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.

S. Regen Ginsburg and Lewis Kates; Kates, Livesey & Edelstein, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before ALDISERT, Circuit Judge, and STAPLETON, District Judge.


Submitted Under Third Circuit Rule 12(6) May 24, 1973.

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.

The question presented is whether appellant, the losing party in extensive litigation, has demonstrated bad faith, vexation, or wanton or oppressive conduct, warranting the imposition upon him of the prevailing party's counsel fees.

In 1967, Frances Sharp Lichtenstein instituted an action based on diversity of citizenship against her husband...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases