HOUK v. ROSS

No. 72-321.

34 Ohio St. 2d 77 (1973)

HOUK ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ROSS, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 2, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Amerman, Burt & Jones Co., L. P. A., and Mr. Jacob F. Hess, Jr., for appellees.

Messrs. Day, Ketterer, Raley, Wright & Rybolt and Mr. Clyde H. Wright, for appellant.


CORRIGAN, J.

Appellant's first two propositions of law deal with the reversal and entry of summary judgment by the Court of Appeals against the appellant-movant.

Appellant argues that reversal by an appellate court of an entry of summary judgment and the subsequent rendering of summary judgment against the movant, in a civil action, constitutes a violation of Section I of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 12...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases