1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Kan.
  4. 211 Kan.
  5. 211 Kan. 869 (1973)
 

LAPHAM v. URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY

No. 46,879

211 Kan. 869 (1973)

508 P.2d 507

REESE LAPHAM, Appellee, v. THE URBAN RENEWAL AGENCY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, AND THE CITY OF KANSAS CITY, KANSAS, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Kansas.

Opinion filed April 7, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James P. Davis, of Stevens, Davis and Haley, of Kansas City, argued the cause, and was on the brief for the appellants.

J.D. Lysaught, of Weeks, Thomas, Lysaught, Bingham and Johnson, of Kansas City, argued the cause, and J.D. McDonald, Jr., of the same firm, was with him on the brief for the appellee.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EMINENT DOMAIN — Deflationary or Inflationary Effect Considered — Court's Discretion in Receiving Evidence. In a condemnation case the property owner should neither be penalized nor benefited by any deflationary or inflationary effect of the nature of the improvement itself. In the trial of a condemnation case involving a long delay between the announcement of the public project and the actual taking of the property, the trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases