Defendant pled guilty to a reduced charge of criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fifth degree in violation of section 220.10 of the Penal Law. He was sentenced to an indeterminate term not to exceed four years. Defendant raises two issues on this appeal. First, that the testimony produced at the suppression hearing failed to establish either actual or constructive possession of a dangerous drug, and second, that the sentence was unduly harsh. The record reveals...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.