PER CURIAM.
Defendant alleges that the trial court erred in accepting his plea of nolo contendere without first determining whether such plea was voluntarily made.
Although it might be inferred from the record that defendant's plea of nolo contendere to a lesser included offense as a result of plea bargaining was freely and voluntarily made, the plea colloquy when viewed under the requirements of our plea rule does not demonstrate...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
