FRUEHAUF CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 91-70, 191-71.

477 F.2d 568 (1973)

FRUEHAUF CORPORATION v. The UNITED STATES. METRO-GOLDWYN-MAYER, INC. and Consolidated Subsidiaries v. The UNITED STATES.

United States Court of Claims.

Decided April 13, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ernest Getz, Detroit, Mich., attorney of record, for Fruehauf Corp.; Dickinson, Wright, McKean & Cudlip, Detroit, Mich., of counsel.

Herbert L. Awe, Washington, D. C., attorney of record, for Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. and Consolidated Subsidiaries; John P. Lipscomb, Washington, D. C., of counsel.

Kenneth R. Boiarsky, Washington, D. C., with whom was Asst. Atty. Gen. Scott P. Crampton, for defendant ; Gilbert E. Andrews, Jr., and Joseph Kovner, Washington, D. C., of counsel in No. 191-71.

Before COWEN, Chief Judge, and DAVIS, SKELTON, NICHOLS, KASHIWA, KUNZIG and BENNETT, Judges.


ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS AND DEFENDANT'S CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

COWEN, Chief Judge, delivered the opinion of the court:

These actions for the refund of income taxes present another of the perplexing questions that often arise with respect to the computation of interest under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. The cases were argued together because Count I of Fruehauf's petition and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer's petition involve similar questions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases