COMMONWEALTH v. PENROSE


363 Mass. 677 (1973)

296 N.E.2d 819

COMMONWEALTH vs. RONALD E. PENROSE.

Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex.

June 1, 1973.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis John Stolaz for the defendant.

John J. Droney, District Attorney, Terence M. Troyer, & Barbara A.H. Smith, Assistant District Attorneys, for the Commonwealth.

Present: TAURO, C.J., REARDON, BRAUCHER, HENNESSEY, & WILKINS, JJ.


BRAUCHER, J.

By this appeal under G.L.c. 278, §§ 33A-33G, the defendant asks us to rule that the validity of his guilty pleas may be challenged by a motion for a new trial under G.L.c. 278, § 29, as amended through St. 1966, c. 301. The trial judge took a contrary view and denied such a motion. The defendant asserts, and we agree, that the remedy by motion is suitable for the purpose, and that such use of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases