1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 20 Ariz.
  5. 20 Ariz. App. 83 (1973)
 

MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF CITY OF TUCSON v. ROYAL

No. 2 CA-CIV 1431.

20 Ariz. App. 83 (1973)

510 P.2d 394

The MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF the CITY OF TUCSON, as elective officers of the City of Tucson, Appellants, v. Robert ROYAL, a qualified elector of Old Ward #6 of the City of Tucson, and a representative of all qualified electors of Old Wards #3, #5 and #6 who reside in an area of the city not within the boundaries of New Wards #3, #5 and #6, Ruddell Byrd, Morris W. Farr, Michael J. Prost, Ruth Stokes and Julie Szekely, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2.

As Modified June 7, 1973.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Herbert E. Williams, City Atty. by Harrison G. Dickey, Sp. Counsel for the City of Tucson, Tucson, for appellants.

Risner, Wolf & Raven by Mark B. Raven, Royal & Murray by Robert A. Royal, Tucson, for appellees.

HOWARD, Judge.

On December 11, 1972, the Mayor and Council of the City of Tucson pursuant to Chapter 16, Sec. 8,1 of the Charter of the City of Tucson, redistricted the City of Tucson by duly passing and adopting Ordinance No. 3959 which set forth new ward boundaries for the six city councilmanic wards. The redistricting equalized the population on a ward basis for the forthcoming elections...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases