BROCK, Chief Judge.
Defendant argues that the testimony of witness Favre on redirect examination is incompetent and highly prejudicial to the defendant because it allowed an officer of the law to explain his failure to enforce the law as to one individual, Randy Pridgen. Favre had testified that he did not charge Randy Pridgen, a fifteen-year-old minor on 4 August 1971, with a violation of the law because Randy Pridgen was a juvenile and the witness "did not figure...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
