In a class action, petitioners sought the issuance of a writ of mandate to require respondents to compensate them in individually minor sums. Respondents' return to the petition denied most of its material allegations and pleaded various affirmative defenses including petitioners' failure
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
RUGGIERO v. LOS ANGELES CITY UNIFIED SCH. DIST.
33 Cal.App.3d 970 (1973)
109 Cal. Rptr. 417
JO ANN RUGGIERO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. LOS ANGELES CITY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY et al., Defendants and Respondents.
Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 16, 1973.
August 16, 1973.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Trygstad & Odell and Lawrence B. Trygstad for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
John D. Maharg, County Counsel, and Richard G. Brungard, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.