Writ refused. On the facts found by the Court of Appeal, we find no error of law in its judgment.
BARHAM, J., is of the opinion the writ should be granted.
TATE, J., dissents. Although under our practice we do not normally review purely factual determinations, this writ should be granted since this decision is in direct conflict with our recent decision in Williams v. Hudson East,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
