1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 291 A.2d
  5. 291 A.2d 699 (1972)
 

CITIZENS ASS'N OF GEORGETOWN, INC. v. WASHINGTON

No. 6411.

291 A.2d 699 (1972)

The CITIZENS ASSOCIATION OF GEORGETOWN, INC., Petitioner, v. Walter E. WASHINGTON et al., Respondents.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided May 19, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William D. Iverson, Washington, D. C., with whom Roberts B. Owen, Washington, D. C., was on brief, for petitioner. Courts Oulahan, Washington, D. C., also appeared on brief as counsel for petitioner.

Richard W. Barton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, with whom C. Francis Murphy, Corp. Counsel, and David P. Sutton, Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on brief, for respondents.

Peter S. Craig, Franz M. Oppenheimer, Washington, D. C., and Robert E. Lieblich, Alexandria, Va., counsel for Committee of 100 on the Federal City, filed a brief as amicus curiae.

Before GALLAGHER, NEBEKER and YEAGLEY, Associate Judges.

GALLAGHER, Associate Judge:

On February 3, 1972, pursuant to Article 91 of the zoning regulations, petitioner filed with the Zoning Commission proposed interim amendments to the zoning classification of an area of Washington known as the Georgetown Waterfront (Waterfront).1 The Zoning Commission has not scheduled a public hearing on these proposed amendments and petitioner now seeks a writ of mandamus compelling the Zoning Commission to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases