PARKER, Judge.
Appellant's sole contention is that the trial court erred during its questioning as to the voluntariness of defendant's plea by not apprising him that upon such plea he could be fined as well as imprisoned. He contends that being an indigent, monetary matters were of "supreme importance" to him, and he seeks to distinguish State v. Harris,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.