1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 458 F.2d
  5. 458 F.2d 524 (1972)
 

AMERICAN BRISTLE & HAIR DRAWING CO. v. UNITED STATES

Customs Appeal No. 5444.

458 F.2d 524 (1972)

AMERICAN BRISTLE & HAIR DRAWING CO., Keer Meurer & Co., Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 27, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barnes, Richardson & Colburn, Sharretts, Paley, Carter & Blauvelt, New York City, attorneys of record, for appellants, Charles P. Deem, Joseph Schwartz, New York City, of counsel.

L. Patrick Gray, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew P. Vance, Chief, Customs Section, James Caffentzis, New York City, for the United States.

Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, ALMOND, BALDWIN, and LANE, Judges.

LANE, Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Customs Court, 65 Cust.Ct. 147, C.D. 4070 (1970), upholding the district director's classification of the imported merchandise, invoiced as "brown processed hoghair," as bristles under item 186.30 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) with duty at the rate of 1¢ per lb. and rejecting appellants' claim of free entry as hog hair under item 186.55 TSUS. We reverse.

The statutory provisions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases