COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYS., INC. v. TELEPROMPTER CORP.

No. 64 Civ. 3814.

355 F.Supp. 618 (1972)

COLUMBIA BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. TELEPROMPTER CORPORATION and Conley Electronics Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 2, 1972.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosenman, Colin, Kaye, Petschek, Freund & Emil, by Asa D. Sokolow, Renee J. Roberts, James K. Nevling, Jr., Harry Olsson, New York City, for plaintiff Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.

Marshall, Bratter, Greene, Allison & Tucker, by Royal E. Blakeman, Bertram Weidberg, New York City, for plaintiff Calvada Productions.

Alexander & Green, by Alfred C. Moran, New York City, for plaintiff Jack Chertok Television, Inc.

Graubard, Moskovitz, McGoldrick, Dannett & Horowitz, by Bernard Buchholz, New York City, for plaintiff, Dena Pictures, Inc.

Cleary, Gottlieb, Steen & Hamilton, by Robert C. Barnard, R. Michael Duncan, Washington, D. C., Katz, Schier, Rosensweig & Sindle, by Walter C. Schier, David Z. Rosensweig, New York City, for defendants.


OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Four years ago, in Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television, Inc., 392 U.S. 390, 88 S.Ct. 2084, 20 L.Ed.2d 1176 (1968) (Fortnightly), the Supreme Court developed the test by which the copyright liability of community antenna television (CATV) systems was to be measured.1 Progress...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases