1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 466 F.2d
  5. 466 F.2d 498 (1972)
 

GURLEY v. LINDSLEY

No. 71-1683.

466 F.2d 498 (1972)

John W. GURLEY et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Herbert P. LINDSLEY et al., Defendants-Appellants-Cross-Appellees. John W. GURLEY et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITIES SERVICE OIL COMPANY, Third-Party Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

September 6, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emmet A. Blaes, Jochems, Sargent & Blaes, Wichita, Kan., William R. Moss, Cecil Kuhne, Crenshaw, Dupree & Milam, Lubbock, Tex., for defendants-appellants-cross-appellees.

John E. Vickers, Lubbock, Tex., Ralph Brock, Brock, Waters & Galey, Lubbock Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.

Cecil C. Cammack, George K. Gilbert, Tulsa, Okl., for Cities Service Oil Co.

Before BELL, AINSWORTH and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants-cross appellees have filed a motion described as a motion to clarify our opinion and judgment entered April 21, 1972,1 and appellees-cross appellants have filed their opposition thereto. We treat the motion as one to recall our mandate and to reissue an amended mandate. See Wichita Royalty Co. v. City Nat. Bank, 97 F.2d 249 (5th Cir. 1938); Seagraves v. Wallace,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases