1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 289 A.2d
  5. 289 A.2d 669 (1972)
 

ARMSTRONG v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY

No. 76-71.

289 A.2d 669 (1972)

Harold E. ARMSTRONG v. HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY et al.

Supreme Court of Vermont, Rutland.

Motion for Reargument Denied April 4, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bloomer & Bloomer, Rutland, for plaintiff.

Divoll & Buckley, Bellows Falls, for Hanover Ins. Co.

Before SHANGRAW, BARNEY, SMITH and KEYSER, JJ., and HILL, Superior Judge.

KEYSER, Justice.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment that Hanover Insurance Company is bound to appear and defend the plaintiff-appellee, its insured, in a suit brought against him as a consequence of an automobile accident.

The accident occurred on June 22, 1968. The appellee was an employee of the highway department of the town of Mount Holly and had been for many years. On the date in question the road commissioner of the town instructed the appellee...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases