PER CURIAM.
The grounds relied upon by the appellant for reversal of her conviction of buying, receiving or aiding in the concealment of stolen property have been considered in the light of the record and briefs and we find no reversible error. We find that the judgment is supported by the evidence and that the several rulings of the trial court challenged by the appellant did not, under the law, constitute error. Therefore, the judgment and sentence appealed are...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
