Order affirmed, without costs, on the ground that there is no substantial evidence to support the determination of the State Human Rights Appeal Board that the petitioner terminated the complainant's employment because of her race and color in violation of section 296 (subd. 1, par. [a]) of the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.