1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 30 Ohio
  5. 30 Ohio St. 2d 64 (1972)
 

STATE v. BOYD

No. 71-587.

30 Ohio St. 2d 64 (1972)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. BOYD, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 3, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Lawrence Huffman, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Mr. Ted Iorio, for appellant.

Per Curiam.

Had the foregoing events occurred after July 1, 1971, when App. R. 4(B)1 became effective, the present controversy would not have arisen. However, appellant contends that the rule is nonetheless applicable because appellee did not move to dismiss the appeal until July 6, 1971. We find it unnecessary to resolve that contention.

Unlike the former procedure in civil...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases