1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 340 F.Supp.
  5. 340 F.Supp. 602 (1972)
 

POLIN v. CONDUCTRON CORPORATION

Civ. A. No. 69-1730.

340 F.Supp. 602 (1972)

Howard POLIN on behalf of himself and on behalf of all others similarly situated shareholders of Conductron Corporation and derivatively, on behalf of Conductron Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CONDUCTRON CORPORATION et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.

March 24, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dilworth, Paxson, Kalish, Levy & Coleman, by William T. Coleman, Jr., Philadelphia, Pa., for plaintiff.

Duane, Morris & Heckscher, by Robert Pratter, Philadelphia, Pa., for Conductron.

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, by Howard L. Shecter, Philadelphia, Pa., and Bryan, Cave, McPheeters & McRoberts, by Veryl L. Riddle, St. Louis, Mo., for McDonnell Douglas and others.

Drinker, Biddle & Reath, by Patrick T. Ryan, Philadelphia, Pa., for Olsen, Cutrona, Mary Siegel, Prosnitz.

OPINION AND ORDER

HIGGINBOTHAM, District Judge.

The above captioned case has been before me since the original three count complaint was filed on July 28, 1968.

Countless orders, arguments and appeals later, the present issue is whether the case should be transferred to the Eastern District of Missouri pursuant to § 1404(a), 28 U.S.C. Section 1404(a) which provides in part as follows:

"(a) For the convenience of parties and witnesses...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases