The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered on the dissenting opinion of Mr. Justice SHAPIRO in the Appellate Division. It is only necessary, in light of the dissenting opinion, to say that failure to provide pretrial minutes on timely demand is grounds for reversal without a showing of prejudice and presumably may not be treated as harmless error (People v. West,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. PEACOCK
31 N.Y.2d 907 (1972)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. William Peacock, Appellant.
Court of Appeals of the State of New York.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued November 28, 1972.
Decided December 29, 1972.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Chief Judge FULD and Judges SCILEPPI, BREITEL and GIBSON concur in memorandum; Judge JASEN dissents and votes to affirm in a separate opinion in which Judges BURKE and BERGAN concur.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.