1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 22 Cal.App.3d
  5. 22 Cal.App.3d 916 (1972)
 

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES v. KLING

Docket No. 37904.

22 Cal.App.3d 916 (1972)

99 Cal. Rptr. 642

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. LOTTA KLING et al., Defendants and Appellants; TRUMAN TAYLOR et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

January 14, 1972.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

O'Neill & Huxtable and Francis H. O'Neill for Defendants and Appellants.

John D. Maharg, County Counsel, and Philip S. Miller, Deputy County Counsel, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Thomas G. Baggot and Irwin M. Friedman for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

FLEMING, J.

Eminent domain proceeding involving the County of Los Angeles, the condemning agency; the Klings, owners of the condemned building and land; and the Taylors, lessees of the condemned building. Two trials were held: a nonjury trial to determine what equipment installed in the building was compensable in eminent domain, and what interests the Klings and the Taylors had in the property and equipment; and a jury trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases